Subject: Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation) From: "Charles White" <chuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 07:51:42 -0800 |
Actually, not through the namespaces, obviously, since the namespace is what it is, but maybe through versioning (like 2.0 and 2.1)? Chuck White Author, Mastering XSLT, Sybex Books http://www.javertising.com/webtech http://www.tumeric.net > Wouldn't the easiest way to handle two levels of conformance be to simply > create two different recommendations with two different namespaces? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Charles White | Thread | RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Tobias Reif | Date | [xsl] get the first of the followi, Cedric Claus |
Month |