Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript
From: Joseph Kesselman <keshlam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:30:15 -0500
Just a quick observation: If you really prefer to think in terms of 
generating TeX rather than XSL-FO,  IBM published a technology 
demonstration quite some time ago which consisted of a  XML equivalent 
syntax for LaTeX and a postprocessor that would convert this into standard 
LaTeX markup.  It might still be available from the alphaWorks website.

______________________________________
Joe Kesselman, IBM Next-Generation Web Technologies:
XML, XSL and more.  "may'ron DaroQbe'chugh vaj bIrIQbej" 
("Put down the squeezebox and nobody gets hurt.")


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread