Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript From: Joseph Kesselman <keshlam@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:30:15 -0500 |
Just a quick observation: If you really prefer to think in terms of generating TeX rather than XSL-FO, IBM published a technology demonstration quite some time ago which consisted of a XML equivalent syntax for LaTeX and a postprocessor that would convert this into standard LaTeX markup. It might still be available from the alphaWorks website. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman, IBM Next-Generation Web Technologies: XML, XSL and more. "may'ron DaroQbe'chugh vaj bIrIQbej" ("Put down the squeezebox and nobody gets hurt.") XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, Zack Brown |
[xsl] Repost - continuation - xalan, TP | Date | RE: [xsl] Stylesheet to remove comm, Andrew Welch |
Month |