|
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript From: Joseph Kesselman <keshlam@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:30:15 -0500 |
Just a quick observation: If you really prefer to think in terms of
generating TeX rather than XSL-FO, IBM published a technology
demonstration quite some time ago which consisted of a XML equivalent
syntax for LaTeX and a postprocessor that would convert this into standard
LaTeX markup. It might still be available from the alphaWorks website.
______________________________________
Joe Kesselman, IBM Next-Generation Web Technologies:
XML, XSL and more. "may'ron DaroQbe'chugh vaj bIrIQbej"
("Put down the squeezebox and nobody gets hurt.")
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, Zack Brown |
| [xsl] Repost - continuation - xalan, TP | Date | RE: [xsl] Stylesheet to remove comm, Andrew Welch |
| Month |