Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:24:24 -0500 |
Having said that, while I am a supporter of FO, given that most of my documents are English and/or mathematics (ie no vertical or bi-directional text no fancy bordered effects) I would always (at the moment) print XML via XSLT stylesheet to latex rather than to FO. (see the pdf versions of the MathML spec for example) It's hard to know in my case though whether that's based on a real unbiased assesment or just a product of having latex somewhere burried deep into my subconcious after having worked on it for 15 years or so.
Cheers, Wendell
___&&__&_&___&_&__&&&__&_&__&__&&____&&_&___&__&_&&_____&__&__&&_____&_&&_ "Thus I make my own use of the telegraph, without consulting the directors, like the sparrows, which I perceive use it extensively for a perch." -- Thoreau
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, Joseph Kesselman |
Re: [xsl] elements to attributes, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] Template Parameter Q, David Carlisle |
Month |