Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript
From: Zack Brown <zbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:46:16 -0800
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:30:15AM -0500, Joseph Kesselman wrote:
> Just a quick observation: If you really prefer to think in terms of 
> generating TeX rather than XSL-FO,  IBM published a technology 
> demonstration quite some time ago which consisted of a  XML equivalent 
> syntax for LaTeX and a postprocessor that would convert this into standard 
> LaTeX markup.  It might still be available from the alphaWorks website.

Please ignore my last reply to this - I wasn't aware that TeXML was a
target and not a source. Sorry about that.

Be well,

> ______________________________________
> Joe Kesselman, IBM Next-Generation Web Technologies:
> XML, XSL and more.  "may'ron DaroQbe'chugh vaj bIrIQbej" 
> ("Put down the squeezebox and nobody gets hurt.")
>  XSL-List info and archive:

Zack Brown

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread