RE: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript

Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript
From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:48:57 +0100
>And earlier, IBM 
>had a product, TeXML I think it was, which provided a declarative XML
>over TeX that you could target in a transform ... then a back end
>could render it into TeX. (Ah, now I see Joe K. has mentioned that.

I'm rather interested in this one, did anyone ever try it out? 

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread