Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:48:57 +0100 |
>And earlier, IBM >had a product, TeXML I think it was, which provided a declarative XML layer >over TeX that you could target in a transform ... then a back end processor >could render it into TeX. (Ah, now I see Joe K. has mentioned that. Check >out alphaworks.ibm.com.) I'm rather interested in this one, did anyone ever try it out? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, Wendell Piez | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, Zack Brown | Date | Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, Oleg Tkachenko |
Month |