Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:18:51 GMT |
>And earlier, IBM >had a product, TeXML I think it was, which provided a declarative XML layer >over TeX that you could target in a transform ... then a back end processor >could render it into TeX. (Ah, now I see Joe K. has mentioned that. Check >out alphaworks.ibm.com.) I'm rather interested in this one, did anyone ever try it out? Yes but only really for very early drafts of XSLT. Once XSLT gained the text output method TeXML rather lost its attraction as it's just as easy to generate the tex directly than to generate the xml-ised tex and it's a whole lot easier to process it. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, bryan | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Stylesheet to remove comm, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] elements to attributes, Challa, Harsha |
Month |