Subject: RE: [xsl] document() access. The combinations From: David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 14:26:44 +0100 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bart Schuller [mailto:schuller+xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > I'd like to see a column that tells what a close reading of > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt says should happen. > > Otherwise people will just look for the notation that works best, > however broken it may be according to the URI spec. If I were a master at spec interpretation I'd do it. I'm not. I'm seeking help. but good suggestion. e.g. who knows how file://\\church\other-path relates to http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1738.txt ? UNC's are not mentioned. More to come. regards DaveP - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] document() access. The co, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] document() access. The co, Mitch Amiano |
Re: [xsl] document() access. The co, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] document() access. The co, Michael Kay |
Month |