RE: [xsl] document() access. The combinations

Subject: RE: [xsl] document() access. The combinations
From: David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 14:26:44 +0100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bart Schuller [mailto:schuller+xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

> I'd like to see a column that tells what a close reading of
> says should happen.
> Otherwise people will just look for the notation that works best,
> however broken it may be according to the URI spec.

If I were a master at spec interpretation I'd do it.
I'm not. I'm seeking help. 
 but good suggestion.

e.g. who knows how 


relates to ?

UNC's are not mentioned.

More to come.
regards DaveP


NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227


 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread