Re: [xsl] document() access. The combinations

Subject: Re: [xsl] document() access. The combinations
From: Mitch Amiano <mitch.amiano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 07:20:28 -0400
I'm not a master of ieft specs either, but 1738 appears to be quite agnostic on the question. file: is system specific,
so it just depends on what the tool implements.

Perhaps file: resolution should attempt to use the smb protocol, but it doesn't sound like an obvious
design decision, at least not when 1738 was written.

- Mitch

David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
If I were a master at spec interpretation I'd do it.
I'm not. I'm seeking help. but good suggestion.

e.g. who knows how


relates to ?

UNC's are not mentioned.

More to come.
regards DaveP

XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread