Subject: [xsl] document() access. The combinations From: Américo Albuquerque <aalbuquerque@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 11:29:37 +0100 |
Hi > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > J.Pietschmann > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:10 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] document() access. The combinations > > > David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > [file://c:/sgml/files/uriIncl.xml] OK > > Content is Some other doc > Amazing. Unless I'm misinterpreting the spec, this should be > interpreted as a file on host "c", with an incomplete port > part, i.e. the URL is malformed. Not quite. If the port is missing them the default port of the chosen protocol should be used (80 for http, 21 for ftp, etc.) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] document() access. The co, Mitch Amiano | Thread | Re: [xsl] document() access. The co, J.Pietschmann |
RE: [xsl] Node-List in Variables, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] document() access. The co, Mitch Amiano |
Month |