[xsl] document() access. The combinations

Subject: [xsl] document() access. The combinations
From: Américo Albuquerque <aalbuquerque@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 11:29:37 +0100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> J.Pietschmann
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:10 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [xsl] document() access. The combinations
> David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > [file://c:/sgml/files/uriIncl.xml] OK
> > Content is Some other doc
> Amazing. Unless I'm misinterpreting the spec, this should be
> interpreted as a file on host "c", with an incomplete port 
> part, i.e. the URL is malformed.

Not quite. If the port is missing them the default port of the chosen
protocol should be used (80 for http, 21 for ftp, etc.)

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread