Subject: RE: [xsl] selecting the nearest preceding sibling From: David Neary <David@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 16:31:04 +0200 |
De : Jarno.Elovirta@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:Jarno.Elovirta@xxxxxxxxx] > > The nearest preceding sibling fitting the criterium is > > the last one in that nodeset (the nodes are always in > > document order)... that is, > > > > preceding-sibling::tag[a and last()] > > Wrong. Simple "last()" will always evaluate to a positive > number, thus the above will compile to > > preceding-sibling::tag[a] Ooops - yes, of course. > Furthermore, nodes are always *processed* in document order, > but preceding-sibling is a preceding axis and [snip] This was new to me though - thanks for the enlightenment. Cheers, Dave. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] selecting the nearest pre, Mukul | Thread | [xsl] keep-together weighting, Anders Svensson |
RE: [xsl] Re: What is the best way , Andrew Watt | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: What is the best way , Andrew Watt |
Month |