Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT model not "natural"? [was Re: [ANN] FreeMarker 2.3 as an alternative to XSLT] From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:46:48 -0400 |
I went up this learning curve myself about 4-5 years ago. I didn't find it easy. I never do find new concepts easy. I struggled when I first learnt SQL, when I learnt goto-less programming, when I learnt object-oriented programming - I even remember struggling the first time I had to understand subroutines. But each time, I've got to the top of the hill and never looked back. It's worth the climb.
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT model not "natural"?, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Re: XSLT model not "natural"?, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] XML to PDF using XSL FO, Venkat Gyambavantha | Date | [xsl] xhtml -> docbook, Rob Rohan |
Month |