RE: [xsl] Re: XSLT model not "natural"? [was Re: [ANN] FreeMarker 2.3 as an alternative to XSLT]

Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: XSLT model not "natural"? [was Re: [ANN] FreeMarker 2.3 as an alternative to XSLT]
From: Américo Albuquerque <melinor@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:07:16 +0100
Hi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Dimitre Novatchev
> Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 7:30 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [xsl] Re: XSLT model not "natural"? [was Re: [ANN] 
> FreeMarker 2.3 as an alternative to XSLT]
> 
> 
> Maybe it is very hard for babies to start walking.
> 
> Shall we "protect" them from this difficulty and ensure they 
> were easily crawling around all their life?
> 
> Make a special tool/product to ensure this?

There is one, in portugal we call it a "spider" :)

And the only thing that cames "naturaly" is eating and sleeping, every thing
else has to be learn in some point of our life.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread