Re: [xsl] XSL to HTML --> XHTML?

[Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>]

Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) wrote:

> Narender S chauhan wrote:
>
> > Out of these Netscape tries to process XSL
> > templates in better way, but that too is far away from what IE 6.0 
> > gives on
> > windows using MSXML.
> > So you would probably need an external XSLT processor to create HTML 
> > files
> > at least for MAC.
> >
> > Wish browsers on MAC could be that powerful.
>
>
> Mozilla is better than that. It's XSLT module [1] works great for me and 
> I'm sure it does so on OS X. It's also scriptable [2] and much more 
> powerfull than IE's MSXML as far as XSL goes... I even wrote a lib for 
> easier cross-browser scripting [3]. Actually, the only XML-related front 
> that brings IE in front of Mozilla is validation.

Well, I like Moz as well, but...

- XSLT is *incredibly* slow compared to IE and
- it lacks a node-set extension function (which is really needed for 
some complex transformations), see Mozilla bug 
<http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215242>)

Regards, Julian

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760


XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list