Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: XSLT vs Perl From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 21:09:18 -0000 |
> The only feature that I really miss is a sequence that can > have sequences as its individual items. If this was offered > then one could write partial applications of functions in an > amazingly compact and readable way. It wouldn't be hard in Saxon to write a pair of extension functions sequence-to-item() and item-to-sequence() that wrap a sequence in a single item (allowing it to be included in a sequence), and unwrap it again. Worth experimenting with. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: XSLT vs Perl, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Use cases for sequence of seq, Dimitre Novatchev |
[xsl] Debugging XSLT, David Tolpin | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, David Tolpin |
Month |