Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl From: roger.day@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:34:01 +0000 |
Xslt has been designed as a language with a purpose; perl has neither of these attributes, hence perl's chaotic nature and unmaintainabilty. But I think, as well, it's a matter of apples and pears. An XSLT application would, IMO, also include Java or some other language. Perl fills in any gap it can gets it's paws on, but I'd rather use python if push came to shove. regards, Roger David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent by: cc: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl rrytech.com 03/02/2004 11:56 Please respond to xsl-list Hi, I have just finished reading the working draft for XSLT 2.0. Forgive me the crudeness: what are advantages of XSLT 2.0 over Perl ( http://www.perl.org/)? David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: XSLT vs Perl, Jim Fuller | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, David Tolpin |
Re: [xsl] FO Processor choice, Kobayashi | Date | Re: [xsl] FO Processor choice, bry |
Month |