Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:11:34 +0400 (AMT) |
> > > Xslt has been designed as a language with a purpose; It was designed as a language with a purpose. > perl has neither of these attributes, hence perl's chaotic nature and > unmaintainabilty. Same about perl and almost the same purpose. What about maintainability, look at CPAN. Can XSLT dream about this volume of maintainable and usable code? > But I > think, as well, it's a matter of apples and pears. An XSLT application > would, IMO, also include Java or some other language. Perl fills in any gap > it can gets it's paws on, A perl application typically includes code written in C, Java and other languages, if needed. > but I'd rather use python if push came to shove. What's the difference between Python and XSLT 2.0? David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, roger . day | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, bry |
RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Rowland Shaw | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, David Tolpin |
Month |