Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl
From: Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 16:32:50 -0800

Jim Fuller wrote:

More 2p.

XML Schema is dead on arrival, always was dead.... it never happened......so the W3C had a bad day, so what, lets get over it and use RELAX NG and move on, or at the very least translate to XML Schema at the last moment.

You have to be joking. Yes, I know the arguments against XSD. But to say it is dead with all the industry support, which *dwarfs* RNG, is crazy.

-Rob

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, (continued) Adam Turoff - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:43:38 -0500 Michael Fuller - Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:32:12 +1100 Jim Fuller - Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:06:02 -0000 Jim Fuller - Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:00:53 -0000 Robert Koberg - Tue, 03 Feb 2004 16:32:50 -0800 <= Jim Fuller - Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:40:05 -0000 Michael Kay - Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:00:47 -0000 David Tolpin - Wed, 4 Feb 2004 01:48:20 +0400 (AMT) Jeni Tennison - Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:31:04 +0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Jim Fuller	Thread	RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Jim Fuller
RE: [xsl] Re: XSLT vs Perl, Jim Fuller	Date	RE: [xsl] date-time formatting ques, Kenny Akridge
	Month