Subject: [xsl] Re: XSLT vs Perl From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:45:27 +0100 |
> Michael, > > I use many different tools, including XSLT, Lisp and Ruby, > but not just these tools. I do not feel passionately, or at all, > that I can design a better language, but it does not mean that I cannot > see that the language designed by W3C is designed poorly. > > I am trying to achieve understanding of causes behind mistakes made > by the committee during design of XSLT 2.0, in order to be able > to avoid similar mistakes myself. What concerns me is that these > mistakes are being made for the last thirty years in many software > projects. > > I'm not discussing persons doing the job, just the job being done. > > I see that you are taking it personally, which is sad. No, Mike asked specific questions, which you avoid to answer... Dimitre Novatchev. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, David Tolpin | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] Empty Elements in .NET, Oleg Tkachenko | Date | [xsl] Re: XSLT vs Perl, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |