Subject: [xsl] Re: XSLT vs Perl From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:47:43 +0100 |
Let me first say "Welcome back" to Jeni :o) > As you know, XSLT 2.0 supports function libraries: you construct a > stylesheet that includes <xsl:function> definitions, and then import > that into other stylesheets as appropriate. Hopefully libraries of > functions, such as those that already exist in EXSLT and FXSL, will be > constructed in this way. And to confirm that FXSL for XSLT 2.0 is making heavy use of xsl:function. Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev [XML MVP], FXSL developer, XML Insider, http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL Resume: http://fxsl.sf.net/DNovatchev/Resume/Res.html XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, J.Pietschmann |
[xsl] Re: XSLT vs Perl, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Conditional processing of, Markus Vaterlaus |
Month |