Subject: Re: [xsl] versioning From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:28:45 GMT |
My own experience of migrating real stylesheets has been that there have been very few problems, and that they have generally related to use of extensions rather than to facilities in the W3C specs. If anyone does have any negative experiences of migration, I will be very interested to hear them (ideally, send them direct to the public-qt-comments@xxxxxx list). OK, I took the bait and ran some XSLT 1.0 stylesheets used in production here (a slightly baroque pipeline of transformations that appears to total just over 13000 lines of xsl using saxon 7.8. comments to be posted to -qt- (after coffee:-) David -- http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] versioning, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] versioning, David Tolpin |
RE: [xsl] is there any tool that au, Willink, Ed | Date | RE: [xsl] versioning, David Tolpin |
Month |