Subject: Re: [xsl] embedding xsl within javascript From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:39:34 +0100 |
> it came from the english dictionary ;) I meant that using "so" implies that you gave a cause but you just said "so it didn't work" with no cause given. > the 2nd one. ie literally {$ImgDir} then either you've a very broken XSLT engine (in which case no suggestions as to the xslt way of doing things will help) or you are not using the syntax inside an attribute value, possibly because of some other part of the styleshet that you didn't show, eg damage done by a CDATA section. > erm why not? Because you can't debug your XSLT based on the browser view (or at least it's hard) If for example the browser just shows a blank screen, all you know is that the html generated is wrong, it's a bit hard to debug teh xslt just from that info. If on the other hand you look at the file and it says <wibble> then you know that wible isn't an html element and you can find out why the stylesheet is producing it. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] embedding xsl within java, Rob Bradley | Thread | RE: [xsl] embedding xsl within java, Rob Bradley |
Re: [xsl] embedding xsl within java, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Can one Use JavaScript to, Pieter Reint Siegers |
Month |