Re: [xsl] using step or following-sibling?

Subject: Re: [xsl] using step or following-sibling?
From: JBryant@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:36:06 -0600
Isn't row[1] short for row[position()=1]? Since he's trying to avoid the 
position() function, isn't that a problem?

I'm curious: What issue do you have with the position function, Matt?

Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services




Geert Josten <Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
12/03/2004 04:21 PM
Please respond to
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
Re: [xsl] using step or following-sibling?






<xsl:value-of select="following-sibling::row[1]/emp_nm" />

Cheers,
Geert


 
 

-- 
Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx
IT-consultant at Daidalos BV, Zoetermeer (NL)

http://www.daidalos.nl/
tel:+31-(0)79-3316961
fax:+31-(0)79-3316464

GPG: 1024D/12DEBB50

Current Thread