Subject: Re: [xsl] using step or following-sibling? From: JBryant@xxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:36:06 -0600 |
Isn't row[1] short for row[position()=1]? Since he's trying to avoid the position() function, isn't that a problem? I'm curious: What issue do you have with the position function, Matt? Jay Bryant Bryant Communication Services Geert Josten <Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx> 12/03/2004 04:21 PM Please respond to xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc Subject Re: [xsl] using step or following-sibling? <xsl:value-of select="following-sibling::row[1]/emp_nm" /> Cheers, Geert -- Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx IT-consultant at Daidalos BV, Zoetermeer (NL) http://www.daidalos.nl/ tel:+31-(0)79-3316961 fax:+31-(0)79-3316464 GPG: 1024D/12DEBB50
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] using step or following-s, Geert Josten | Thread | Re: [xsl] using step or following-s, Geert Josten |
Re: [xsl] using step or following-s, Geert Josten | Date | [xsl] Joining children attributes w, Ross Niemi |
Month |