Subject: Re: [xsl] using step or following-sibling? From: Geert Josten <Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 22:52:03 +0100 |
;-) Grt(z)
Isn't row[1] short for row[position()=1]? Since he's trying to avoid the position() function, isn't that a problem?
I'm curious: What issue do you have with the position function, Matt?
Jay Bryant Bryant Communication Services
Geert Josten <Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx> 12/03/2004 04:21 PM
Please respond to
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc
Subject Re: [xsl] using step or following-sibling?
<xsl:value-of select="following-sibling::row[1]/emp_nm" />
Cheers, Geert
-- Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx IT-consultant at Daidalos BV, Zoetermeer (NL)
http://www.daidalos.nl/ tel:+31-(0)79-3316961 fax:+31-(0)79-3316464
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] using step or following-s, JBryant | Thread | Re: [xsl] using step or following-s, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Creating unique groups, Dave Roe | Date | Re: [xsl] Extracting the grouping f, Peter Wyngaard |
Month |