Subject: Re: [xsl] using step or following-sibling? From: Geert Josten <Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:29:57 +0100 |
> unsatisfactory about that solution. It still leaves the question: is there an alternative for > position()?
What have you got against position() It's very hard to think of answers to your question without knowing _why_ you are trying to solve the problem only using a subset of the language, and without knowing exactly which subset that is.
David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] using step or following-s, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] Joining children attributes w, Ross Niemi |
[xsl] Is there a free multiplatafor, IceT | Date | Re: [xsl] Add attributes Processed , David Carlisle |
Month |