Re: [xsl] using step or following-sibling?

Subject: Re: [xsl] using step or following-sibling?
From: Geert Josten <Geert.Josten@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:29:57 +0100
> unsatisfactory about that solution. It still leaves the question: is there an alternative for > position()?

What have you got against position()
It's very hard to think of answers to your question without knowing
_why_ you are trying to solve the problem only using a subset of the
language, and without knowing exactly which subset that is.

David

Don't ask me! I didn't post the question.. :-)


Look up the start of the thread to find out who...

Grtz

Current Thread