Subject: RE: [xsl] Can Saxon be made to understand Xalan extensions? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:05:45 -0000 |
You can't make Saxon understand Xalan extensions, but you can use the Saxon equivalent. In Saxon 8.x you can use the XSLT 2.0 standard feature xsl:result-document, so in fact you don't even need a Saxon extension. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > > 1. My own stylesheets have some problem running Xalan, I get > OutOfMemory (or > was it StackOverflow). Saxon works without problems. > > 2. I also use in the same system, docbook.sf.net which says > that Xalan doesn't > work against that set. Norman recommends (among others) Saxon. > > 3. A new thrid-party stylesheet I would like to use, uses a > Xalan extension, > http://xml.apache.org/xalan/redirect, which Saxon complains about. > > Is there any way I can make Saxon understand how to deal with > this extension > (not including hacking Saxon's source code), or to make Saxon > delegate the > entire transformation to the JDK1.4 default transformer ?? > > Alternatively, is there a Saxon equivalent? The 'redirect' > allows me to > output to other files than what is given as the output > stream, and this > stylesheet use this to create a set of reports in one transformation > invocation. > > Cheers > Niclas > -- > --------------- > The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard. > - Steven Wright > > +---------//-------------------+ > | http://www.dpml.net | > | http://niclas.hedhman.org | > +------//----------------------+
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Can Saxon be made to unde, Mark Lundquist | Thread | [xsl] Multiple IDs, Elliotte Harold |
Re: [xsl] Can Saxon be made to unde, Kevin Rodgers | Date | Re: [xsl] Character substitution, Jim Fuller |
Month |