RE: [xsl] Recursion and for-each-group (XSLT 2.0)

[JBryant@xxxxxxxxx]

Yup. That works.

Thanks much, Mike.

Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)




"Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
04/06/2005 09:41 AM
Please respond to
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
<xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: [xsl] Recursion and for-each-group (XSLT 2.0)






I suspect what you want is something like this:

<xsl:template name="index-level">
  <xsl:param name="entries" as="element(indexentry)*"/>
  <xsl:for-each-group select="$entries" group-by="@term">
    <xsl:sort select="current-grouping-key()"/>
    <indexentry term="{@term}"
target="{generate-id(ancestor::*[indexentries][1]}">
      <xsl:call-template name="index-level">
        <xsl:with-param name="entries" 
select="current-group()/indexentry"/>
      </xsl:call-template>
    </indexentry>
  </xsl:for-each-group>
</xsl:template>

<xsl:template match="/">
  <xsl:call-template name="index-level">
    <xsl:with-param name="entries" select="//indexentries/indexentry"/>
  </xsl:call-template>
</xsl:template>

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: JBryant@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:JBryant@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 06 April 2005 15:24
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [xsl] Recursion and for-each-group (XSLT 2.0)
> 
> > One question about the structure of your data: is it possible to
> > encounter
> 
> > <indexentry term="dog">
> >   <indexentry term="leg">
> > </indexentry>
> > <indexentry term="table">
> >   <indexentry term="leg">
> > </indexentry>
> > 
> > and if so, are the two references to "leg" to be combined, or not?
> > This doesn't arise in your sample, so I can't tell.
> 
> Yes, that can happen. No, they shouldn't be combined.
> 
> If it helps any, this is the index for a book. The larger 
> stylesheet of 
> which this solution will eventually be a part is for software 
> user guides. 
> Ideally, it should support anything you might see in the 
> average index.
> 
> I have a working solution for three levels of index entries, because 
> that's all I ever use. However, the problem of arbitrarily 
> deep nested 
> grouping interests me in its own right.
> 
> Thanks for the help.
> 
> Jay Bryant
> Bryant Communication Services
> (presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)