Re: [xsl] I need to make sure that all namespace declarations get output to a particular element, not the document element

[Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx>]

G. Ken Holman wrote:
> False.  The namespace node has been pruned away from the <root> 
> element so does not require a declaration.  The node cannot be pruned 
> from a literal-result-element that needs it.  Saxon places the 
> namespace declaration where it needs it and not anywhere higher.
>
> <snip />
>
> I think David's assertion is still correct ... it cannot be moved 
> "down" the tree ... the declaration is placed where there is a 
> namespace node in the result tree and your examples of pruning or not 
> pruning the namespace nodes impact on the presence of a namespace node 
> on your <root> result element.
>
> I'm still wary of a processor moving the namespace declaration "up" 
> the tree ... though not incorrect (assuming they haven't confused 
> namespaces), I don't see how the result tree node has namespace nodes 
> requiring declarations ... surely they are not moved up the tree.  Why 
> would a processor bother with the look-ahead to determine "future" use 
> of namespace nodes?  But he is correct to say that it is not incorrect.

Hi Ken,

I did not mean that anything unexpected was happening there. I just 
wanted to make a point. Apparently, when you have an RLE like this:

<root>
<elem xmlns:test="urn:test">
  <bla>
    <test:xyz />
  </bla>
</elem>
<root>

then, when serializing, Saxon leaves that RLE precisely as-is. It does 
not move the namespace declaration to the first element that needs it, 
neither does it move it up the tree to the root (like you, I don't 
expect it too). However, once you add this namespace to the 
xsl:stylesheet (with exclude-result-prefixes), it does seem to do some 
cleanup and move the namespace declaration down the tree to the moment 
where it is first needed.

I think this extra level of control is nice and will help the OP. I 
don't think that I am saying something that is different from what you 
or David says, I only add that Saxon leaves the namespace declaration 
where it is on any RLE, even when it is not needed directly on that very 
RLE (unless you put that namespace to the xsl:stylesheet and/or when you 
add exclude-result-prefixes)


> I hope this helps.

Well, I was not the one in need of help, but thanks, it does clarify 
things. Bryan, sorry if I went off-topic.

Cheers,
-- Abel