Re: [xsl] XSL 2.0 and .NET and VB

["M. David Peterson" <m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 04:13:17 -0600, M. David Peterson  
<m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hmmm... Yes and know.  I would lean more towards things being faster  
> when you consider that a significant majority of the requests are for  
> browsers that support XSLT.  Of course, dependent upon how busy your  
> site is, a good portion of those requests are going to be from search  
> engines.  For less busy sites in which the perentage of non-XSLT-support  
> requests are going to be noticably higher, I think it's going to be a  
> matter of testing to really find out for sure if there is an overall  
> savings or not.

Also worth pointing out, and just to be fair:  Over the coming years,  
mobile devices are going to demand a greater share of the percentage of  
requests.  Of course, in this case, the need for a server system that  
transforms the output into a greater number of formats is going to  
increase, *especially* when you consider than more phones by default are  
supporting SVG[1] and MSFT has significant interest in promoting the use  
of Silverlight in the mobile device space.

So in this regard, the use of an advanced server-side processing system  
that has the ability to output multiple format types is going to increase,  
where as the ability to transform via client-side XSLT is going to  
decrease dependent, of course, on whether or not client-side XSLT makes  
its way into the mobile device space.  I personally have my doubts that it  
will as it would be a bit too power hungry to be attractive to a mobile  
device manufacturer, but I could easily be wrong (and hope that I am.)

+1 Jirka
+1 M:D


[1] http://svg.org/special/svg_phones (WARNING: Page is ~3megs of phone  
pics and related text)

--
/M:D

M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 |  
http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155