Subject: Re: [xsl] Testing implicit XHTML hierarchy From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 01:13:23 +0100 |
me> I may have mistyped, but you shouldn't need the [1]'s two true statements me> in for example $h[.+1][1] me> as $h[.+1] is %h[position()=.+1] so can return at most 1 item, a statement that's not quite as true as one might wish... I don't want to index with . (the value on the sequence) but with current() the index value coming from the for-each, if I use current() my statement that you only get one item is true and the code works (I claim) even ran it past saxon this time:-0 sorry about that. David <xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <xsl:variable name="h" select="//xhtml:*[matches(local-name(),'^h[1-6]')]/number(substring(local-name(),2))"/> <xsl:template match="/"> <xsl:if test="not($h[1]=1 and count($h[.=1])=1)">h1 not right</xsl:if> <xsl:for-each select="1 to count($h)-1"> <xsl:if test="$h[current()+1]-$h[current()] gt 1"> section head jumped by more than one level </xsl:if> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Testing implicit XHTML hi, bryan rasmussen | Thread | RE: [xsl] Testing implicit XHTML hi, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Testing implicit XHTML hi, bryan rasmussen | Date | Re: [xsl] Testing implicit XHTML hi, bryan rasmussen |
Month |