Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></tag> is the way it is (wa

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></tag> is the way it is (was Re: [xsl] IE Client side transformation issue)

Subject: Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></tag> is the way it is (was Re: [xsl] IE Client side transformation issue)
From: "Manfred Staudinger" <manfred.staudinger@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:19:52 +0200

On 03/08/07, Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There is a cdata-section-elements on xsl:output, but not a
> never-minimize-elements attribute or something similar.
There is no need for such an attribute, because MSXML3 handles
the two cases differently. If you specify in your stylesheet
<div style="display: none"/> it becomes <div style="display: none" />
(invalid html)
but
<div style="display: none"></div> becomes <div style="display: none"></div>
in the output.

Note that there is _no_ need to using nbsp or xsl:comment to ensure valid html !

Manfred

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] IE Client side transformation issue, (continued) Manfred Staudinger - Fri, 3 Aug 2007 16:55:01 +0200 David Carlisle - Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:12:00 +0100 Abel Braaksma - Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:51:19 +0200 David Carlisle - Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:01:39 +0100 Manfred Staudinger - Fri, 3 Aug 2007 19:19:52 +0200 <= Abel Braaksma - Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:41:00 +0200 Message not available G. Ken Holman - Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:57:57 -0400 Manfred Staudinger - Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:37:34 +0200 Message not available G. Ken Holman - Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:39:12 -0400

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] IE Client side transformation issue, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></, David Carlisle	Thread	Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></, Abel Braaksma
Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></, Abel Braaksma	Date	Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></, Abel Braaksma
	Month