|
Subject: [xsl] Javascript for extension functions From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:12:25 +0100 |
>>>>> "Abel" == Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Abel> And indeed, then people don't have to bind
Abel> themselves to their own host language but everyone can use
Abel> the same language for extensions, which is a much better
Abel> design choice than the awkward suggestions I was making
Abel> earlier.
>>
>> That's sounds like a possibility. Would it suit a PHP
>> programmer?
>>
surely it will, esp. because most PHP programmers write for the
Abel> internet and this usually requires ecmascript/javascript
Abel> skills: it is familiar already.
But is it useful?
What will the programer be able to do that (s)he cannot do with
xsl:function?
If using the host language, I can envisage various answers, but Javascript?
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] XML structure to HTML uno, Abel Braaksma | Thread | Re: [xsl] Javascript for extension , Abel Braaksma |
| Re: [xsl] Dynamic creation of Frame, Abel Braaksma | Date | RE: [xsl] Identical entries in diff, Meyer, Roland 1. (NS |
| Month |