Subject: Re: [xsl] the future of xslt From: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:34:03 +0100 |
On Sun, Jun 22 2008 10:28:47 +0100, james.fuller.2007@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > I do have a 'point' ... I am trying to gather adhoc and statistically > relevant material on putting some % on the likeliness of any of the > following occurring; > > * will XSLT 2.0 experience significant adoption ? what about xslt 2.0 > in the browser ? > * XSLT on other devices e.g. hardware, mobile platforms > * will adoption flow from XSLT 1.0 to XSLT 2.0 or ... XSLT 1.0 to XQuery ? > * will we have XSLT 3.0 As a data point rather than a statistic, the libxslt (xsltproc) XSLT processor is edging closer to the point of starting a XSLT 2.0 version [1]. Even discussing a 2.0 version would be passC) if XSLT 2.0 itself was heading towards becoming passC). Regards, Tony Graham Tony.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Director W3C XSL FO SG Invited Expert Menteith Consulting Ltd XML, XSL and XSLT consulting, programming and training Registered Office: 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland Registered in Ireland - No. 428599 http://www.menteithconsulting.com -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- xmlroff XSL Formatter http://xmlroff.org xslide Emacs mode http://www.menteith.com/wiki/xslide Unicode: A Primer urn:isbn:0-7645-4625-2 [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/xslt/2008-June/msg00009.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, James Fuller | Thread | Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, Colin Paul Adams |
Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, James Fuller | Date | Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, Colin Paul Adams |
Month |