Re: [xsl] the future of xslt

[Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>>>> "Tony" == Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Tony> Of course, it may instead be that some other open source C
    Tony> XSLT 2.0 processor appears, but if it did, it might well be
    Tony> advised to also have a libxslt-compatible API, given the
    Tony> Perl, Ruby, PHP, C++, and Python bindings for libxslt that
    Tony> are in use today.

I keep meaning to provide a C binding to Gestalt - it isn't very much
work to do. But somehow I never find the time.

But it surely wouldn't be compatible with libxslt, as that would imply
a similar architecture.
-- 
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire