Re: AW: [xsl] XML to PDF (XSL:FO)

Andrew Welch wrote:

> >> aren't FO specific questions like asking XHTML specific
> >> questions

> >  Actually XSL-FO is on topic by definition of XSL List:

> Sure, but really, what does FO have to do with XSLT - other than
> distant history and similarities in the name?

  Yes, the reason is historic (I guess), and it would be rather weird
now to create a list about XSLT, XPath *and* XSL-FO.  Nevertheless,
that doesn't make XSL-FO questions off-topic on XSL List...

  Regards,

--drkm

      _____________________________________________________________________________ 
Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr

Current Thread
Re: AW: [xsl] XML to PDF (XSL:FO), (continued) Message not available Wendell Piez - 25 Jun 2008 14:25:36 -0000 Message not available Andrew Welch - 26 Jun 2008 09:32:45 -0000 Florent Georges - 26 Jun 2008 09:47:35 -0000 Andrew Welch - 26 Jun 2008 10:03:29 -0000 Florent Georges - 26 Jun 2008 10:53:40 -0000 <= Michael Kay - 26 Jun 2008 10:01:21 -0000 Message not available Wendell Piez - 26 Jun 2008 17:17:02 -0000 Message not available Tony Graham - 26 Jun 2008 21:00:08 -0000 B Tommie Usdin - 26 Jun 2008 21:16:33 -0000

Current Thread

Re: AW: [xsl] XML to PDF (XSL:FO), (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: AW: [xsl] XML to PDF (XSL:FO), Andrew Welch	Thread	RE: AW: [xsl] XML to PDF (XSL:FO), Michael Kay
Re: AW: [xsl] XML to PDF (XSL:FO), Andrew Welch	Date	RE: [xsl] Chunking large CALS table, Kevin Bird
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home