Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT

> All fairly trivial. For example a custom handler coupled with IIS 7.0 and
> you could have that up-and-running within a day.

Well I would use Saxon with Glassfish or Tomcat... but I guess you
have Saxon.net so it is possible with IIS.   Either way implementing
it yourself is easy.

With SOA being the big thing at the moment, XSLT is easily one of the
best placed languages to combine those services into XHTML... the way
I see it, XSLT 2.0 is _the_ serverside language of the future...
Reading and writing XML and inbuilt XML types will just be redundant
in an end-to-end XML stack.


-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, (continued) Scott Trenda - 27 Jun 2008 15:23:43 -0000 Colin Paul Adams - 27 Jun 2008 15:25:51 -0000 Andrew Welch - 27 Jun 2008 15:39:49 -0000 Joe Fawcett - 27 Jun 2008 15:44:04 -0000 Andrew Welch - 27 Jun 2008 15:53:27 -0000 <= Scott Trenda - 27 Jun 2008 18:51:52 -0000 Colin Paul Adams - 27 Jun 2008 19:04:19 -0000 Scott Trenda - 27 Jun 2008 19:23:03 -0000 Colin Paul Adams - 27 Jun 2008 19:37:01 -0000

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Joe Fawcett	Thread	RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda
RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Houghton,Andrew	Date	Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Michael Ludwig
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home