Re: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "can you sell an XSLT?"

[Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Andrew Welch wrote:

> Something simple like:

> <xsl:include
href="library.sar"/>

> where library.sar is "stylesheet archive", a standard
zip with
> some kind of meta pointing to the primary stylesheet.

  I think
this is the opposite of the approach where the URI is
used to identify WHAT
(which module) instead of WHERE (where to
find the *.xsl file or the
pre-compiled one.)  Don't forget we
use uniform resource identifiers now, and
not locators
anymore ;-)

  If the library.sar contains the *.xsl modules and
a little
descriptor telling which modules to expose (something like "the
module library.xsl in the ZIP file must be published at the URI
http://example.com/xsl/library.xsl, other modules are private",)
the processor
within which it is "deployed" (or "installed," for
instance by copying the
*.sar to a specific directory) can then
map:

    <xsl:include
href="http://example.com/xsl/library.xsl"/>

to:
<sar-repository>/library.sar!library.xsl

(or any other place it unziped or
compiled the module to.)  More
in the way catalogs operate, but everything
packaged in a single
file (that's what users want, I guess.)

  Regards,

--
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/