Subject: RE: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "can you sell an XSLT?" From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:53:39 +0100 |
> I was going to say to make things "final" you could restrict > it to xsl:include only.... Or introduce a final attribute. > > Personally I would be quite happy if it were limited to include only. > You can override template rules (but not named templates or global variables) with an xsl:include; you can also extend or modify keys, decimal formats, namespace aliases, attribute sets, imported schemas, and various other things. So limiting it to xsl:include doesn't really solve the problem. Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "c, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "c, Florent Georges |
Re: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "c, Florent Georges | Date | Re: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "c, Florent Georges |
Month |