Subject: Re: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "can you sell an XSLT?" From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:07:27 +0100 |
> We haven't done any serious work on this yet, but it's tentatively on the > agenda. Not so much an archive format as such, but rather, language changes > to make separate compilation of modules a realistic proposition. At the > moment it's a non-starter, because almost anything you assume to be true > when you compile a library module can be overridden when you import it from > a new top-level module. I was going to say to make things "final" you could restrict it to xsl:include only.... Or introduce a final attribute. Personally I would be quite happy if it were limited to include only. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "c, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "c, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "c, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "c, Florent Georges |
Month |