Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1 From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:12:50 +0200 |
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Michael Kay<mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think the W3C should seriously consider free membership for >> individuals ... charging enormous fees will always ensure >> that when times get financially tough that they lose resouces >> immediately. > > In practice, if individuals are prepared to contribute effort, they will be > usually be allowed to join as invited experts. Anyone in this position is > welcome to contact the chair. great news and first time I heard of this, perhaps the W3C should communicate this via the normal channels I am sure there are plenty of people who would take up on this kind of thing. > I think the proportion of individuals to big-company representatives has > actually been increasing as times get harder. But everyone is finding travel > difficult. I would expect the 'proportion' to increase directly along the lines that individuals are less able to afford; sounds like this maybe a benefit for the bigger companies to get more representation and tips things to their favor. > generates many ideas which are feeding into Saxon which will benefit the > community whether or not it succeeds as a standard. +1 to that. Jim Fuller
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, James A. Robinson |
RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, James A. Robinson |
Month |