Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1

James A. Robinson wrote:

Yes, that's a tough one. There have been four XSLT 2.0 implementations which is not unreasonable (how many independent implementations of Javascript are there? How many are needed?).
Ok, so I'm missing one. I'm aware of Saxon, Altova, and IBM (a beta,
I thought?) implementing XSLT 2 systems.  I had thought Intel was going
to build one, but I had also thought they pulled out.  Who is the forth
(if I even have the other two correct)?

Gestalt (http://gestalt.sourceforge.net/)

--

	Martin Honnen
	http://msmvps.com/blogs/martin_honnen/

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, (continued) James Fuller - 30 Jul 2009 10:15:16 -0000 Michael Kay - 30 Jul 2009 10:45:34 -0000 James Fuller - 30 Jul 2009 11:13:38 -0000 James A. Robinson - 30 Jul 2009 11:44:44 -0000 Martin Honnen - 30 Jul 2009 11:48:48 -0000 <= Joe Fawcett - 30 Jul 2009 12:01:40 -0000 James A. Robinson - 30 Jul 2009 12:06:51 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, James A. Robinson	Thread	RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, Joe Fawcett
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, James A. Robinson	Date	RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.1, Joe Fawcett
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home