RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.1

Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.1
From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:00:50 +0100
I think he meant Gestalt (http://sourceforge.net/projects/gestalt/).

-- 

Joe
http://joe.fawcett.name/

-----Original Message-----
From: James A. Robinson [mailto:jim.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 30 July 2009 12:44
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1 

 
> Yes, that's a tough one. There have been four XSLT 2.0 implementations
which
> is not unreasonable (how many independent implementations of Javascript
are
> there? How many are needed?). 

Ok, so I'm missing one. I'm aware of Saxon, Altova, and IBM (a beta,
I thought?) implementing XSLT 2 systems.  I had thought Intel was going
to build one, but I had also thought they pulled out.  Who is the forth
(if I even have the other two correct)?

Jim

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
James A. Robinson                       jim.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Stanford University HighWire Press      http://highwire.stanford.edu/
+1 650 7237294 (Work)                   +1 650 7259335 (Fax)

Current Thread