Subject: Re: [xsl] Associating javascript with XSL and XML From: Rob Belics <rob_belics@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:07:57 -0600 |
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 13:49 +0100, Martin Honnen wrote: > Whether you directly write (X)HTML or whether your stylesheet is > supposed to generate (X)HTML I would strongly suggest to aim at valid > documents (i.e. html, head, body, and script and style where they > belong). In the text/html world you might get way with not having any > html or head or body elements and just throwing fragments of documents > at the browser but I don't think this is a good idea in the case of > X(HT)ML to expect the browser to guess what you want and add html or > head or body element as needed. Little known factoid: the html, body and head opening and closing tags are all optional.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Associating javascript wi, Martin Honnen | Thread | Re: [xsl] Associating javascript wi, Martin Honnen |
Re: [xsl] tag with one blank body, Bartolomeo Nicolotti | Date | RE: [xsl] tag with one blank body, Michael Kay |
Month |