Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?
From: Michael Dykman <mdykman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:28:45 -0500

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Aaron Gray
<aaronngray.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> What I was hoping for was more convincing that there are real gaps in the "market" for XSLT 2.0 engines and particularly in the C/C++ implementation space.
>>
>
> Porting Saxon from Java to C++ would be a good move !
>

It sounds like an excellent idea.  Are you volunteering?

-- 
 - michael dykman
 - mdykman@xxxxxxxxx

 May the Source be with you.

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?, (continued) Message not available Wendell Piez - 19 Jan 2010 16:25:54 -0000 Message not available Dimitre Novatchev - 19 Jan 2010 17:55:36 -0000 Message not available Wendell Piez - 19 Jan 2010 22:05:23 -0000 Aaron Gray - 19 Jan 2010 18:53:17 -0000 Michael Dykman - 19 Jan 2010 20:29:10 -0000 <= Aaron Gray - 19 Jan 2010 20:51:48 -0000 Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex - 19 Jan 2010 21:01:55 -0000 Aaron Gray - 19 Jan 2010 21:05:08 -0000 Vyacheslav Sedov - 19 Jan 2010 21:23:54 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Aaron Gray	Thread	Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Aaron Gray
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Aaron Gray	Date	Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Aaron Gray
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home