Subject: Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors? From: Michael Dykman <mdykman@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:28:45 -0500 |
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> What I was hoping for was more convincing that there are real gaps in the "market" for XSLT 2.0 engines and particularly in the C/C++ implementation space. >> > > Porting Saxon from Java to C++ would be a good move ! > It sounds like an excellent idea. Are you volunteering? -- - michael dykman - mdykman@xxxxxxxxx May the Source be with you.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Aaron Gray | Thread | Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Aaron Gray |
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Aaron Gray | Date | Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Aaron Gray |
Month |