Subject: Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors? From: Vyacheslav Sedov <vyacheslav.sedov@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:23:27 +0300 |
for C/C++ world maybe better option is to compile XSLT 2.0 stylesheet into C/C++ code (if you need very fast conversion) but even with this case i suggest that pros and cons not vote for this case too JDK7 with G1 for Saxon (maybe EE) probably much better idea to get lightspeed XSLT 2.0 conversion (don`t forget about second front in face of AMD & Intel "brains") 2010/1/20 Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > 2010/1/19 Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex <gerrit.imsieke@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >> >> On 19.01.2010 21:51, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> >>> If I had time I would. Would be better if one or a subset of the Saxon >>> development community did it. >> >> Dr. Kay's left leg, for example. > > It authored By one person ! Wow, sorry Dr Kay. > > Aaron
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Aaron Gray | Thread | Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Abel Braaksma |
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Aaron Gray | Date | [xsl] Balisage 2010 Call for Partic, B Tommie Usdin |
Month |