Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?

2010/1/19 Michael Dykman <mdykman@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Aaron Gray
> <aaronngray.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> What I was hoping for was more convincing that there are real gaps in the
"market" for XSLT 2.0 engines and particularly in the C/C++ implementation
space.
>>>
>>
>> Porting Saxon from Java to C++ would be a good move !
>>
>
> It sounds like an excellent idea.  Are you volunteering?

If I had time I would. Would be better if one or a subset of the Saxon
development community did it.

Another alternative is to implement a XSLT processor on top of
Apache's Xerces :-

    http://xerces.apache.org/

Theres a C++ version as well as Java and Perl.

Aaron


>  May the Source be with you.

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?, (continued) Message not available Dimitre Novatchev - 19 Jan 2010 17:55:36 -0000 Message not available Wendell Piez - 19 Jan 2010 22:05:23 -0000 Aaron Gray - 19 Jan 2010 18:53:17 -0000 Michael Dykman - 19 Jan 2010 20:29:10 -0000 Aaron Gray - 19 Jan 2010 20:51:48 -0000 <= Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex - 19 Jan 2010 21:01:55 -0000 Aaron Gray - 19 Jan 2010 21:05:08 -0000 Vyacheslav Sedov - 19 Jan 2010 21:23:54 -0000 Abel Braaksma - 20 Jan 2010 15:41:43 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Michael Dykman	Thread	Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Michael Dykman	Date	Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home