Subject: Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors? From: Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:01:39 +0000 |
2010/1/19 Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > 2010/1/19 Michael Dykman <mdykman@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Aaron Gray >> <aaronngray.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> What I was hoping for was more convincing that there are real gaps in the "market" for XSLT 2.0 engines and particularly in the C/C++ implementation space. >>>> >>> >>> Porting Saxon from Java to C++ would be a good move ! >>> >> >> It sounds like an excellent idea. Are you volunteering? > > If I had time I would. Would be better if one or a subset of the Saxon > development community did it. > > Another alternative is to implement a XSLT processor on top of > Apache's Xerces :- > > http://xerces.apache.org/ > > Theres a C++ version as well as Java and Perl. Oh, sorry the Perl "version" is just a C++ wrapper. Aaron
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Date | Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Aaron Gray |
Month |