Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors?

[Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

At 09:23 AM 1/18/2010, Justin wrote:
> So let's rephrase my original quandary yet again.
>
> "Given the neglect (i.e. XSLT for anything else other than 
> Saxon/Java (notwithstanding .Net autoport)),
> does *any other* community really want one?"

I'm not sure there's been neglect, exactly. It's more complicated than that.

We might just be about where mobile phone technology was ca. 1985.

I think there's a long way to go still. I don't think that the lack 
of uptake in the free software community is necessarily an indicator 
of anything other than the complexity of the task and the excellence of Saxon.

I also think that Mike Kay's having shifted his model to a more 
"mature" one (if you want the more advanced features you can pay) is 
a good thing for the market, not just for him. It's an affirmation 
that the investment is worth something.

Cheers,
Wendell



======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================