Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs javascript performance From: Jagdishwar B <jagdishwar.beemanati@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:02:16 +0530 |
>Rob Belics wrote: >After some Googling, I've only found one article that claims xslt would >be "many times faster" but without any reason for saying that Yes, xslt is faster. possible reasons could be: xslt is based on xpath expressions which use regular expressions, that are executed by xslt engine like msxml if you use MS internet explorer for instance. if you yourself use DOM, then you yourself need to consider and test all the use cases that a regular expression handles. -- BJagdishwar.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs javascript perfor, Robert Koberg | Thread | Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequ, Mukul Gandhi |
RE: [xsl] [XSL] unparsed-text with , Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] "xsl", xslt and xsl-fo [W, Dave Pawson |
Month |