Subject: Re: [xsl] import, xslt 2.1 From: Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:54:23 +0000 |
On 12/03/2010 11:09, Dave Pawson wrote:
Any reason this shouldn't be an avt?
It would have to be a very severely constrained avt, like use-when normally an avt has access to the all variables, functions etc that are defined in the stylesheet, but xsl:import needs to be resolved before the stylesheet can be compiled (or at least before it can be assembled from precompiled bits)
What would values would you want the expression to depend on?
input parameters to the stylesheet? values in the source? baase-uri of the importing stylesheet? something else?
David
So if it's a configuration issue, restricting it to a combination of input param and literal would be sufficient I think
-- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] import, xslt 2.1, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] HTTP-Header charset different, Bartolomeo Nicolotti |
Re: [xsl] import, xslt 2.1, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] HTTP-Header charset different, Bartolomeo Nicolotti |
Month |