Subject: Re: [xsl] Ordered union of sequences From: Michael Müller-Hillebrand <mmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:01:17 +0200 |
Wolfgang, Thanks for the warning/reminder! It is not planned to create a full schema here, the complexType created is just a sequence of optional elements. At the moment it isn't a sequence at all, they use <xs:all>, but want the sequence if they have the method to find/correct the inconsistencies. The source data is spread all over a 1000+ pages Reference Manual authored and changed by humans. - Michael Am 08.04.2010 um 17:45 schrieb Wolfgang Laun: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Michael M|ller-Hillebrand > <mmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> BTW, the idea behind this is to create part of an XML Schema from evaluating document instances. > > You do realize that this isn't possible. Any number of XML documents > you analyze, you can't be sure that the XML Schema contains > <xs:sequence>, <xs:all> or <xs:choice>, with minOccurs="0" or > maxOccurs="x" in the "right" place. > > Have you considered investigating the approach of using "exclusion by > contradiction"? Rather than trying to construct the correct ordering, > look for contradictions to one of the aforementioned particle > structures, and use whatever remains.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Ordered union of sequence, Wolfgang Laun | Thread | RE: [xsl] Ordered union of sequence, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Ordered union of sequence, Michael Müller-Hille | Date | RE: [xsl] Ordered union of sequence, Michael Kay |
Month |